U613-A Explosion-proof Terminal Boxes

U613-A Explosion-proof Terminal Boxes

The boxes are suitable to be used in outdoor and indoor places of zones 1 and 2 where there is explosive mixture

Features:

Enclosure is made of casting aluminium alloy,

Surface is sprayed with plastics.

Connection with tube or through wiring.

Explosion-proof approva:l

The flow control valve has been tested and granted Ex approval.

The Ex-approval is EX m II T4.Ex certificate number is CE021037.

Package:

Product ID Net Weight Cross Weight Size

U613-A 32kg/case of 200

37kg/case of 200 22.5x22.5x33.5 cm /case of 200

on quickly increase in recent year, consumption of finished oil increase al well, the vapor pollution and resource waste in forecourt become more important safety factor in considerable filing station, safety distance and vapor density in particular. At present, vapor separator device is installed and obtain content effect in most of large and middle cities reference to foreign improving measures. Its recovery principle is divided as two phases: first phase refers to closed discharge from tank vehicle; second phas fuel dispenser e refers to vapor recovery as refueling oil. Phase I vapor-recovery system The first phase system aims at to rebuild the delivery pipe and vapor recovery pipe between vehicle tank and tank. (Diagram 4-1) The volume of vapor will be increased as flowing into tank because of waves and shock. Therefore, the inlet pipe should be deeply stretched under oil level so as to reduce oil waves. As for a tank exceeding 945L of volume, inlet pipe is needed stretching into oil no higher 15cm than bottom of tank. Oil flows into tank from under level, vapor flow back into vehicle tank under pressure. In principle, the volume of oil and vapor is corrective. In order to make as little as vapor volatize during delivery, the structure of traditional ventilating pipe should be improved, making system in sealed state under normal pressure range. Reclaimed vapor is dealt with through condensation, adsorption and burn afte fuel dispenser r taking back. Its operation principle is similar to the vapor system of balanced nozzle. Diagram 4-1: Phase I Vapor Recovery System The pipeline installation is illustrating in Diagram 4-2. The height of air pipe at least 4m. The length of back air is shorter than air pipe, diameter larger than that of air pipe. It is prohibited to appear overflow phenomenon as vehicle tank discharge, shut off switch of air pipe. The jointer between air back and discharge pipe should adopt speed jointer. Phase II vapor-recovery system Phase II refers to the progress in which vapor in vehicle tank is fuel dispenser

requires it　　 (length n2)　　 61 Failed PIN attempts LLLVAR ans ..999 Conditional if card scheme requires it　　 (length n1)　　 64 Message authentication code b 8 Mandatory　　 Wednesday 10 May 2006 - Revision 03　　Document title　　IFSF POS to FEP Interface　　Section fuel dispenser Page　　Message Content 48178　　 Table 19 Authorization request response (1110)　　Element Data element name Format Attribute Usage notes　　number　　 1 Second bit map b 8 Conditional (see ISO 8583). Not required　　 3 Processing code n 6 Mandatory - conditional format (see ISO　　 8583)　　 4 Amount transaction n 12 Conditional. Specifies authorized amount.　　 This fuel dispenser may be other than the requested　　 amount.　　 7 Date and time transmission MMDD n 10 Mandatory　　 hhmmss　　 11 Systems trace audit number n 6 Mandatory echo　　 12 Date and time local transaction YYMMDD n 12 Mandatory echo　　 hhmmss　　 fuel dispenser

oversial charities. These embraced a wide range of causes, including support for abortion, euthanasia and sex equality, and opposition to the death penalty, nuclear power and war. The experiment was set up so that the volunteers could choose to accept or reject choices such as to give away money that cost them nothing; to give money that was subtracted from their pots; to oppose donation but not be penalised for it; or to oppose donation and have money taken from them. The instances where money was to be tak fuel dispenser en away were defined as “costly� Such occasions set up a conflict between each volunteer s motivation to reward themselves by keeping the money and the desire to donate to or oppose a cause they felt strongly about. Faced with such dilemmas in the minds of their subjects, the researchers were able to examine what went on inside each person s head as they made decisions based on moral beliefs. They found that the part of the brain that was active when a person donated happened to be the brain s reward centre—the mesolimbic pathway, to give it its proper name—responsible for doling out the dopamine-mediated euphoria associated with sex, money, food and drugs. Thus the warm glow that accompanies charitable giving has a physiological basis. But it seems there is more to altruism. Donating also engaged the part of the brain that plays a role in the bonding behaviour between mother and child, and in fuel dispenser romantic love. This involves oxytocin, a hormone that increases trust and co-operation. When subjects opposed a cause, the part of the brain right next to it was active. This area is thought to be responsible for decisions involving punishment. And a third part of the brain, an area called the anterior prefrontal cortex—which lies just behind the forehead, evolved relatively recently and is thought to be unique to humans—was involved in the complex, costly decisions when self-interest and moral beliefs were in conflict. Giving may make all sorts of animals feel good, but grappling w fuel dispenser